Andre Lukosiute vs Madelief Hageman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Oct at 09:16 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Lukosiute vs M. Hageman

LTU
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lukosiute 1 - 0 Hageman
They have played 2 sets in total, with Andre Lukosiute winning 2 and Madelief Hageman winning 0. The last match between Andre Lukosiute and Madelief Hageman was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 03-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Andre Lukosiute getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Lukosiute | 1 |
Hageman | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Sharm ElSheikh(10-03-25)
A. Lukosiute vs M. Hageman H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
60.69% (105-68) | Career Total W/L | 50.55% (137-134) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
2 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Lukosiute vs M. Hageman Match Preview:
- Madelief Hageman outperforms Andre Lukosiute in second serve points, winning 38.12% compared to Lukosiute's 35.42%. Does this serve as a significant advantage? Yes, it often correlates with match success.
- In return game stats, Lukosiute claims a slight edge in returning second serves at 49.42% versus Hageman's 49.14%.
- When facing first serves, Hageman is notably stronger, achieving a 38.18% success rate compared to Lukosiute’s 33.66%.
- Under pressure, Hageman is slightly better at saving breakpoints, with a 47.51% save rate over Lukosiute's 45.19%, a crucial advantage during critical game moments.
- Looking at overall performance, Lukosiute has a higher match win rate over the past year (67.50%) compared to Hageman’s 51.61%.
- On preferred surfaces, both excel on clay with a win rate of 67%, but Hageman’s hard court win rate is significantly lower at 41%.
- Lukosiute has more success in lower-tier tournaments, winning 71.88% of her matches, while Hageman has won just 49.02% in similar events.
- The average opponent rank faced by Lukosiute is 318.48, slightly tougher than Hageman’s average opponent rank of 331.81.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Hageman's 41% win rate in such scenarios is preferable to Lukosiute's 29%.
Editorial Prediction (October 2, 2025, UTC):
Madelief Hageman has demonstrated superior skills in second serve points and first serve returns, both critical in gaining an upper hand. Her ability to save breakpoints slightly better than her opponent provides an additional advantage in tense moments.
Andre Lukosiute, despite a stronger overall win rate over the past year and facing tougher opponents, lacks the edge in pressure situations and decisive match sets, arenas where Hageman excels.
Given the comparative analyses, the likelihood points towards Madelief Hageman emerging victorious in this upcoming duel, leveraging her returning skills and resilience under pressure to secure the match.
Andre Lukosiute vs Madelief Hageman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Lukosiute vs M. Hageman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 8 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
2:2:27 | Average Match Time | 2:2:27 |
59% (38/64) | 1st Serve % | 61% (47/77) |
74% (28/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (27/47) |
50% (13/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (13/30) |
57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
48% (37/77) | Return Points Win % | 36% (23/64) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Lukosiute Recent Matches Played
M. Hageman Recent Matches Played

A. Lukosiute vs M. Hageman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60.69% (105/68) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.55% (137/134) |
61.73% (242/150) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.84% (311/313) |
55.69% (2064/1642) | Games Win/Loss | 51.36% (2972/2815) |
60.99% (86/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (14/21) |
66.67% (2/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.74% (119/111) |
60.71% (17/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
229 | Aces Total | 185 |
0.43 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
779 | Total Double Faults | 557 |
1:32:19 | Average Match Time | 1:20:52 |
390.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 337.05 |
66% (6123/9287) | 1st Serve % | 65% (8728/13414) |
64% (3895/6123) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (4969/8728) |
43% (1376/3164) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2061/4686) |
48% (574/1185) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (862/1757) |
47% (4330/9262) | Return Points Win % | 47% (6267/13240) |
50.88% (29/28) | Challenger W/L | 39.47% (15/23) |
65.52% (76/40) | Futures W/L | 52.36% (122/111) |
61% (105/172) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (136/270) |
50% (15/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 20% (9/45) |
33% (16/48) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (45/83) |
83% (114/95) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (133/114) |
17% (114/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (133/19) |
17% (58/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (138/23) |